What is Dramaturgy?

When I was assigned the role of Rubbish Theatre’s dramaturge I had never heard of this position before, so I went on a personal mission to discover all I needed to know about being a dramaturge. The first question I seeked the answer for – what is dramaturgy? It appears to be open to debate about how to define dramaturgy, with each dramaturge having their own definition.  Esther Pilkington and Daniel Ladnar describe “‘dramaturgy’ and ‘dramaturg’ as fluid and unstable terms” (Pilkington and Lander, 2009) which can have a “variety of meanings and functions … in different contexts” (Pilkington and Lander, 2009). Mary Luckhurst claims in her book Dramaturgy: A Revolution in Theatre that “dramaturgs and literary managers are a lynchpin of mainstream, state-funded theatre” (Luckhurst, 2006), though “The meanings of the words dramaturg and dramaturgy are unstable”. (Luckhurst, 2006). Luckhurst does go on to describe dramaturges as “critical thinkers” (Luckhurst, 2006) which are vital to the industry.

After reading about how other people define their role, I came to understand how I personally see my role. As a dramaturge I am a weaver who takes all the individual strings of a performance and weaves them together to create a well crafted piece of work. I am the outside eye; I observe the rehearsal process and create the logic of the world of the play. I revise the work of my peers and I fit all of the pieces together. I work with a balanced mixture of academic research and creativity.


Works Cited

Pilkington, E. and Lander, D. (2009) Performance Research. Dramaturgy, 14(3) 129-131.

Luckhurst, M. (2006) Dramaturgy: A relovution in Theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Art Exhibition

Michael Pinchbeck invited us to go and view some Master graduate students artwork. Their work was all about process. We were able to see their starting points and their process into their final product. This was an eye-opener for me, as I could see how something can be formed from nothing. The famous quote by Margaret Wolfe Hungerford “beauty is in the eye of the beholder” (Hungerford, 1878). This was completely true for the artists work, you could how they saw something from the normal items and created something beautiful. One of the artists had formed a beautiful painting out of wood chippings; it startled me at how something so simple could create something so lovely. The picture below is an image I took at the art exhibition of the start and finish of the process for one of the artists:

IMG_7550

Credit: Emily Brunt

Seeing these pieces art allowed me to open up my imagination into what we as a Theatre Company could create. It also made me aware that not everything needs to be complicated, and how simplicity can be just as effective.

 

Works Cited:

 

Hungerford, M.W. (1878) Molly Bawn. Britain: Bernhard Tauchnitz.

Starting With Movement – ‘The Erratic Scene’

On the 23rd of February 2017 I wanted to help the company to become relaxed in their bodies. As we are looking into a lot of movement to be used throughout the performance itself, I started with a simple exercise. I asked the company to lay in the space and close their eyes, i then played two pieces of music and told them to go with their bodies. I wanted them to feel their bodies move and loosen so they are confident when it comes to movement choreography. Eventually, throughout the process I got them to open their eyes and react with each other. Some results of this are shown in the photos below. The movement exercise revealed to me as their choreographer how much the company members could move with their bodies which helped me to understand what movements I could assign for this scene I was in the process of choreographing.

Movement exercise with the company

Movement exercise with the company. Photo Credit: Kerrie Crockford

17270453_967301206737751_2016200104_n

Photo Credit: Kerrie Crockford

17270147_967301203404418_723730101_n

Photo Credit: Kerrie Crockford

 

 

 

Afterwards with the collaboration with the company we worked to choreograph what I will call for now ‘The Erratic Scene’. As we are still in the process of ideas and devising at this point, this scene creation may not necessarily be in the final production but it was interesting to see what came out of the creation and idea I had for this scene. I asked the company to think of a movement, could have been an everyday task, and asked them to repeat it. One by one they entered the stage and performed their movement. Jacob Toon was riding the bike, as he is powering the show. Gradually I directed that they get more erratic with their movements and bigger to create chaos on the stage. Throughout the process of choreography for this scene was all about being random, the idea of being erratic was to build up a tension and feeling for the audience. Yet the movements to be used throughout were to be random and confusing for them. As Hoggett and Scott from Frantic Assembly write: ‘allowing even the most random event to shape and alter and exercise, to leave the path or idea prescribed maybe only moments earlier and to free up the room in order to make the most of a newfound impulse, influence or inclination.’ (Hoggett and Scott, 2009,26).  Following from what Hoggett and Scott wrote, we use the idea of repetition and randomness to add creativity for our piece. In particular our piece is exploring the methods and stages of madness and within this scene I wanted to represent that with the random movement.  The end product show and increase in pace, tempo and rhythm of movement representing, in my eyes, a breakdown of the character that Jacob is playing. As he cycles faster the movement of the ensemble builds and becomes more intense creating ‘The Erratic Scene’.

Reference

Hoggett, S., and Scott, G. (2009) The Frantic Assembly Book of Devising Theatre. London: Routledge.